Georgia’s high ranking in Chandler report reflects strong support for private sector - Georgian Gov’t Administration Head
Levan Zhorzholiani, the Head of the Georgian Government Administration, on Tuesday said that Georgia’s 29th place in the Chandler Institute’s 2025 Good Government report - ahead of 15 EU and NATO member states - was a direct result of state programs designed to stimulate private sector growth.
In his remarks, Zhorzholiani emphasized that both central Government institutions and local municipalities were actively involved in programs aimed at helping businesses expand and innovate.
“This report measures the Government’s ability to maximally support the private sector through concrete initiatives. In this regard, the Government has numerous programs, both at the local self-government and central Government levels, which provide support for private initiatives and businesses, subsidize specific sectors, stimulate various business activities, and promote the development of new areas”, he said.
He further noted that, given the scale and diversity of Governmental support, Georgia’s ranking was a logical outcome rather than an unexpected achievement.
“Therefore, Georgia’s position in the global ranking is not surprising. This ranking is based on a global study by the World Bank, involving seven international evaluation organizations”, Zhorzholiani concluded.
The Chandler Institute has published its long-term vision rankings as part of its 2025 Good Governance Report.
Georgia was ranked 29th among the world’s top thirty and 19th among Europe’s top twenty for its private-sector-supportive governance.
Other News
Georgian Parliament Speaker says international order no longer exists amid US exit from global organisations
08.01.2026.17:01
Georgian Parliament Speaker Shalva Papuashvili on Thursday commented on the United States’ withdrawal from dozens of international organisations, saying that this once again confirms what the Georgian Government has been saying - that the international order no longer exists.
“When we assess the process as a whole, the fact that the United States has exited 66 organisations in itself once again confirms what we have been saying - that the international order created after World War II, which includes membership in various international organisations and the discussion of issues within their frameworks, no longer exists and has been disrupted”, the Speaker said.
He noted that when the United States withdraws from such organisations and justifies its decision by labeling them as ineffective and wasteful, it inevitably undermines their credibility and seriousness.
“When the United States is not a member of such organisations and leaves them with the justification that they are useless and wasteful, this naturally shows that their credibility has already been called into question”, he continued.
He emphasised that the US decision once again supports the view that the existing international order has effectively ceased to function.